Alexander I is a saint of the Pre-Schism (Universal) Church (d. 115). Alexander I's feast day is celebrated on 3 May.
Alekjds
License: CC BY 3.0
Alexander I
Saint- Life Span
- d. 115
- Feast Day
- 3 May
- Gender
- male
- Church
- Pre-Schism (Universal)
Places
Relics & Where to Venerate
Location unknown
The bodily remains of Alexander I are a first-class relic. Venerated at Freising Cathedral.
Roles & Family
Canonization
Biography
Pope Alexander I was Bishop of Rome in the early second century and is traditionally counted as the sixth successor of Saint Peter in that see, after Linus, Anacletus, Clement, and Evaristus, and before Sixtus I. Almost nothing about his life can be established from contemporary documents. The earliest independent testimony is that of Irenaeus of Lyons, who in the late second century listed Alexander among the bishops of Rome in order to demonstrate the apostolic succession of the Roman church. Eusebius of Caesarea, writing in the fourth century, assigned him an episcopate of about ten years and placed it in the time of the emperors Trajan and Hadrian. Later papal catalogues and the Liber Pontificalis give more exact but mutually inconsistent figures; modern reconstructions commonly situate his pontificate somewhere in the approximate range from about 105 to 119, with many reference works adopting circa 107 to 115. No ancient source records a year of birth, and the year of his death is known only by these later calculations rather than by a dated contemporary notice.
The Liber Pontificalis, compiled in Rome in the sixth century and regarded by historians as largely legendary for the first generations of the papacy, describes Alexander as a Roman by birth, the son of another Alexander, from the district called Caput Tauri. It credits him with inserting into the Eucharistic prayer the institution narrative referring to the night on which Christ was betrayed, with ordering that water mixed with blessed salt be kept in churches for the sprinkling of Christian homes, and with other liturgical regulations. Modern scholarship treats these notices as retrojections of later Roman practice rather than as genuine second-century acts. No letters, decrees, or theological writings of Alexander survive, and there is no evidence that he convened a synod or played a documented role in the doctrinal controversies of his age, such as the early stages of the debate over the date of Easter or the first appearances of Gnostic teachers in the capital.
A later hagiographical tradition, preserved in the Liber Pontificalis and in a passio of Alexander, Eventius, and Theodulus, presents the pope as a martyr who was arrested, imprisoned, and finally beheaded on the Via Nomentana north of Rome, and who was buried at the seventh milestone of that road. Nineteenth-century excavations at that site uncovered a cemetery basilica with inscriptions naming those three saints, which at first seemed to confirm the legend. Subsequent study has led most specialists to conclude that the Alexander venerated on the Via Nomentana was probably a martyr of a later date, distinct from the early second-century bishop, and that the two figures were conflated in medieval legend. Consequently, while the Roman Martyrology still styles Pope Alexander I a martyr, critical historians treat the martyrdom as unproven. Whether he died a natural death or in a local outburst of persecution under Trajan or Hadrian cannot be determined from the surviving evidence.
From late antiquity Alexander was honored as a saint in both East and West. The Latin church long kept his feast on 3 May, a date shared with the martyrs Eventius and Theodulus; the celebration was dropped from the General Roman Calendar in 1960 on historical grounds, though his name remains in the Martyrology. Byzantine and other Eastern calendars have commemorated him on 16 March and on other days. Relics attributed to him have been reported at Santa Sabina in Rome, at Freising in Bavaria, and elsewhere, yet none of these identifications can be verified. He belonged to no religious order, and no source records a wife or children. He is not the established patron of any particular city, trade, illness, or group. His historical importance lies less in any recoverable biography than in his place in the second-century succession of Roman bishops, a succession already cited by Irenaeus as a guarantee of apostolic teaching at a time when the church of Rome was still a modest, largely Greek-speaking community within the capital of the empire.